ShipReady vs Reeve

The public write-up reports finding categories and counts across the sample rather than a per-app score.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

No score, no grade, no badge. Every finding shows the request that produced it and the date it was read.

The research report is public. The public pages do not describe a self-serve scan for arbitrary URLs.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

The full free result is shown to anyone with the check id. Nothing is gated behind a paywall or an account.

Automated outside checks at research scale. The pages do not describe signing in as your users or executing your database functions.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

Deterministic outside requests only. Never signs in, never executes a function on your database, never reads another account's data.

Neither an outside scanner nor a public research report can prove these from a URL. They need code, account, runtime or operational access.

• Rollback and recovery. Whether you can put the previous version back, and how long that takes.
• Error monitoring. Whether a failure in production reaches a human rather than sitting in a log nobody opens.
• Sign in and account flows. Whether sign in, password or code reset, and session expiry behave under real use.
• Rate limiting and abuse controls. Whether a script can hammer your forms, sign up loop, or paid endpoints without being slowed down.
• Key rotation. Whether you can replace a leaked key quickly and know everywhere it is used.
• Certificate expiry date. Whether the certificate is close to expiring. A normal request proves the certificate is valid right now, and the runtime this check uses cannot read the expiry date from that request.
• One account reading another account's data. Whether a signed in account can reach another account's records by changing an id. ShipReady does not create accounts, sign in, or call your functions, so this cannot be answered from outside.
• Payment handling. Whether payment events are verified, replay safe, and matched to the right customer record.
• Customer data handling. Whether stored personal details are limited, deletable on request, and out of your logs.
• AI feature controls. Whether prompts, spend, and model output are bounded so one visitor cannot run up the bill.
• Database row rules. Whether the row rules behind the app actually stop one signed in account reading another's rows.

The report describes issue categories rather than per-builder fix prompts.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

Every finding carries five fix prompts for Lovable, Bolt, Base44, v0 and generic coding assistants, hand written per finding.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

Read the report and cross reference the categories against your own build.

Source: https://reeve.page/ (read 2026-09-14)

You can stop at the free check, or buy the Release Gate at $49 for the package, the Launch Review at $199 for a person, or the Hardening Sprint at $1,750 for the fix work.